Neverland Ranch: Semen Stains, Cocaine And Demerol
March 21, 2019
In the midst of the 2005 investigation, startling revelations emerged concerning the discovery of semen from two unidentified males on Michael Jackson's bed mattress, in addition to his own. Further incriminating findings unveiled that semen from a third male was detected on bed sheets and a pair of underpants at the Neverland estate. Compounding the gravity of the situation, traces of cocaine were found on one pair of undergarments, while Michael Jackson's DNA was identified amidst blood spots containing Demerol.
The semen did not match the genetic profiles of Gavin or Star Arvizo, deepening the intrigue surrounding the unknown males involved. Though the possibilities of how the semen got there are endless, the most likely scenario is that Jackson was having sexual encounters with adult males, contradicting his denials that he wasn't gay.
Following further rigorous testing to confirm the presence of semen, the prosecution sought to introduce the pair of semen-stained underpants attributed to another male as supporting evidence, aligning with Gavin's testimony regarding Jackson's retention of his underwear.
Below I will take you through what was stated in the legal documents.
"Several semen stains were recovered from defendant's bed mattress and from a pair of underpants seized from his home, from which DNA was extracted. The profile identified as "male 1" is the defendant's. The other profiles found on the bed and the underpants are not his. The sources are unidentified. The DNA on the bed will not be referred to by the People. However the DNA in the underpants suggests that Jackson kept a pair of soiled underpants belonging to another male, just as he did with Gavin, thereby corroborating Gavin's testimony. We do intend to introduce that pair of underpants and the DNA results."
Read the full document here: drive.google.com
As expected, Thomas Mesereau and Jackson's defence team diligently pursued all available avenues to exclude this crucial evidence from being presented in the courtroom.
Mesereau response:
"There are two DNA reports in this case. The first DNA report says 3 male DNAs were found on Mr. Jackson's mattress. Of these 3 males, one was identified as Mr. Jackson, aka "male 1." The remaining 2 males were not identified. However, the report says that these 2 males are not the alleged victims in this case, i.e., Gavin Arvizo and Star Arvizo."
"The second DNA report says a fourth male DNA was found in bed sheets. The bed sheets presumably were found in a laundry bag, along with underwear. The fourth male is unknown, but is not the alleged victim, i.e., Gavin Arvizo or Star Arvizo. These DNA reports have no relevance to any of the charged crimes, particularly the alleged molestation, in this case. There is no nexus between Mr. Jackson's DNA and the alleged crime."
Thomas Mesereau's silence regarding the semen stains found on Michael Jackson's bed is very revealing. Instead of considering the possibility of Jackson being gay or bisexual and having consensual relationships with other men at home, or the chance that his bedroom may have been used by his gay acquaintances while he was away, Mesereau avoids addressing these potential explanations altogether.
As mentioned before, they also discovered cocaine at Neverland and found that Michael Jackson was using and misusing Demerol.
The prosecution document reads:
"One pair of underpants recovered from Jackson's residence had a blood stain. The stain contained cocaine and Demerol. The DNA profile from that stain is in fact defendant's. It is believed that Jackson has been a Demerol addict for many years and a significant amount of evidence supports that belief. That evidence includes a near-empty vial found on his property with the label torn off containing Demerol; a letter from a Dr. Farschian in Miami promising defendant help in curing him of his "D" addiction; a doctor who acknowledged having delivered him Demerol to his house; and numerous witnesses who speak of his addiction'. In addition defendant has publicly acknowledged in the past that he had become addicted to prescription medications, and that he required medical intervention for that addiction."
"Defendant suggests the blood-spot on his underwear may have been the result of a "medical injection" he receives for "vitiligo." We are reliably informed there is no injectible medication for vitiligo. And that explanation doesn't account for the Demerol in the blood. We also will seek to introduce evidence of the presence of cocaine in his underpants. Cocaine was found on two locations on that garment; in the fabric sample contain the blood stain and on another sample of the fabric taken and examined as a reference sample. The most likely reason the cocaine was detected on both samples is that defendant excreted it in both his blood and his urine."
"How stoned was he when he crawled into bed with those two boys behind multiple locked doors?" may be a very relevant question. Should defendant testify, his chronic use of Schedule III drugs win be relevant on the issue of how well he recalls events and his state of awareness during those events."
Mesereau response:
"Mr. Jackson's underwear was found in a laundry bag, along with the bed sheets (discussed in section 13 above). This underwear had bloodstain and cocaine. A forensic lab for the Prosecution tested this underwear. No cocaine, however, was found in the blood."
"Mr. Jackson has vitiligo. A medical injection he receives causes him to dispense blood. The underwear with the bloodstain reflects this fact. It is unknown how and why the cocaine was found on the underwear. It may be evidence of contamination. In the alternative, someone may have brought cocaine during a fundraising party at Neverland in September 2003, where hundreds of people. including well-known celebrities, were present."
"In short, neither the underwear nor the cocaine found on the underwear {and not in Mr. Jackson's blood) has probative value to any of the charged crimes in this case. Mentioning these items of irrelevant and extraneous factors will only inflame the jurors and prejudice Mr. Jackson's rights to a fair trial."
Jackson’s defence team attempted to attribute the blood stains to his vitiligo condition, suggesting that he needed to administer medication through injections. However, this explanation was rebutted by Thomas Sneddon, who highlighted the absence of injectable vitiligo medication and the lack of clarification from Thomas Mesereau regarding the presence of Demerol in the blood spots.
Regarding the cocaine discovery, the defence sought to shift responsibility to potential "visitors," implying the involvement of other celebrities at Neverland. Given Jackson's well-documented history of drug abuse, which ultimately led to his demise, it is highly plausible that he also engaged in cocaine use while sharing his bed with unrelated young boys. The defence's attempt to dissociate Jackson from these substances is contradicted by substantial evidence of his own substance abuse.
Read the defence document in full here: drive.google.com
It is particularly ironic that staunch supporters of Michael Jackson argue that Neverland provided a secure environment for children under constant supervision, including Jackson's private bedroom. However, the unexplained presence of two unidentified males in his bedroom, purportedly depositing their bodily fluids on his private bed without detection by the security, maids, and other staff members, challenges the notion of a diligently monitored sanctuary. Additionally, the implication that Neverland was a setting for visits by celebrities engaged in cocaine use further undermines the image of a safe and controlled environment.